+ case "${usergroup_phase}" in + local run_cmd + run_cmd=run_su + shift + run_su /opt/pkg/bin/bmake configure BATCH=1 DEPENDS_TARGET=/nonexistent WRKLOG=/tmp/bulklog/premake5-5.0.0.b2nb8/work.log + su pbulk -c '"$@"' make /opt/pkg/bin/bmake configure BATCH=1 DEPENDS_TARGET=/nonexistent WRKLOG=/tmp/bulklog/premake5-5.0.0.b2nb8/work.log => Checksum BLAKE2s OK for premake-5.0.0-beta2-src.zip => Checksum SHA512 OK for premake-5.0.0-beta2-src.zip ===> Installing dependencies for premake5-5.0.0.b2nb8 ========================================================================== The following variables will affect the build process of this package, premake5-5.0.0.b2nb8. Their current value is shown below: * CURSES_DEFAULT = ncurses * READLINE_DEFAULT = readline * SSLBASE (defined) * SSLCERTBUNDLE (not defined) * SSLCERTS = /etc/opt/pkg/openssl/certs * SSLDIR = /etc/opt/pkg/openssl * SSLKEYS = /etc/opt/pkg/openssl/private Based on these variables, the following variables have been set: * CURSES_TYPE = ncurses * READLINE_TYPE = readline * TERMCAP_TYPE = curses You may want to abort the process now with CTRL-C and change the value of variables in the first group before continuing. Be sure to run `/opt/pkg/bin/bmake clean' after the changes. ========================================================================== => Tool dependency gmake>=3.81: found gmake-4.4.1 => Tool dependency unzip-[0-9]*: found unzip-6.0nb10 => Tool dependency cwrappers>=20150314: found cwrappers-20220403 => Tool dependency checkperms>=1.1: found checkperms-1.12 => Full dependency lua53-socket-[0-9]*: found lua53-socket-3.0rc1nb5 => Full dependency curl>=8.11.0nb2: found curl-8.11.1nb1 => Full dependency libzip>=1.11.2nb3: found libzip-1.11.2nb3 => Full dependency lua53>=5.3.0<5.4: found lua53-5.3.6 => Full dependency mbedtls3>=3.4.0nb1: found mbedtls3-3.6.2 => Full dependency zlib>=1.2.3: found zlib-1.3.1 => Full dependency bzip2>=1.0.1: found bzip2-1.0.8 => Full dependency gettext-lib>=0.22: found gettext-lib-0.22.5 => Full dependency libiconv>=1.9.1: found libiconv-1.17 => Full dependency libidn2>=2.0.0: found libidn2-2.3.7 => Full dependency libunistring>=0.9.3: found libunistring-1.2 => Full dependency libxml2>=2.6.2: found libxml2-2.12.9nb3 => Full dependency ncurses>=5.3nb1: found ncurses-6.5 => Full dependency nghttp2>=1.0.0: found nghttp2-1.64.0nb3 => Full dependency openssl>=1.1.1: found openssl-3.3.2 => Full dependency readline>=2.2: found readline-8.2nb2 => Full dependency xz>=5.0.0: found xz-5.6.3 ===> Overriding tools for premake5-5.0.0.b2nb8 ===> Extracting for premake5-5.0.0.b2nb8 ===> Patching for premake5-5.0.0.b2nb8 => Applying pkgsrc patches for premake5-5.0.0.b2nb8 => Verifying /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/devel/premake5/patches/patch-aa => Applying pkgsrc patch /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/devel/premake5/patches/patch-aa Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-aa,v 1.1 2023/05/08 22:37:31 nikita Exp $ | |Remove the hardcoded -L/usr/lib and -L/usr/lib64 |This is not needed, and will cause issues: |https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/25825#issuecomment-1179497476 | |--- modules/d/tools/dmd.lua |+++ modules/d/tools/dmd.lua -------------------------- Patching file modules/d/tools/dmd.lua using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 52. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |--- modules/d/tools/gdc.lua |+++ modules/d/tools/gdc.lua -------------------------- Patching file modules/d/tools/gdc.lua using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 228. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |--- modules/d/tools/ldc.lua |+++ modules/d/tools/ldc.lua -------------------------- Patching file modules/d/tools/ldc.lua using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 323. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |--- modules/gmake/tests/cpp/test_ldflags.lua |+++ modules/gmake/tests/cpp/test_ldflags.lua -------------------------- Patching file modules/gmake/tests/cpp/test_ldflags.lua using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 55. Hunk #2 succeeded at 64. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |--- modules/gmake2/tests/test_gmake2_ldflags.lua |+++ modules/gmake2/tests/test_gmake2_ldflags.lua -------------------------- Patching file modules/gmake2/tests/test_gmake2_ldflags.lua using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 56. Hunk #2 succeeded at 65. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |--- src/tools/gcc.lua |+++ src/tools/gcc.lua -------------------------- Patching file src/tools/gcc.lua using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 477. done ===> Creating toolchain wrappers for premake5-5.0.0.b2nb8 ===> Configuring for premake5-5.0.0.b2nb8 => Checking for portability problems in extracted files ERROR: [check-portability] => Found test ... == ...: ERROR: [check-portability] binmodules/luasocket/gem/myps2pdf:42: if [ $best == 1 ] Explanation: =========================================================================== The "test" command, as well as the "[" command, are not required to know the "==" operator. Only a few implementations like bash and some versions of ksh support it. When you run "test foo == foo" on a platform that does not support the "==" operator, the result will be "false" instead of "true". This can lead to unexpected behavior. There are two ways to fix this error message. If the file that contains the "test ==" is needed for building the package, you should create a patch for it, replacing the "==" operator with "=". If the file is not needed, add its name to the CHECK_PORTABILITY_SKIP variable in the package Makefile. =========================================================================== ERROR: [check-portability] => Found test ... == ...: ERROR: [check-portability] binmodules/luasocket/gem/myps2pdf:76: if [ $rot == 1 ] Explanation: =========================================================================== The "test" command, as well as the "[" command, are not required to know the "==" operator. Only a few implementations like bash and some versions of ksh support it. When you run "test foo == foo" on a platform that does not support the "==" operator, the result will be "false" instead of "true". This can lead to unexpected behavior. There are two ways to fix this error message. If the file that contains the "test ==" is needed for building the package, you should create a patch for it, replacing the "==" operator with "=". If the file is not needed, add its name to the CHECK_PORTABILITY_SKIP variable in the package Makefile. =========================================================================== ERROR: [check-portability] => Found test ... == ...: ERROR: [check-portability] binmodules/luasocket/gem/myps2pdf:81: if [ $eps == 1 ] Explanation: =========================================================================== The "test" command, as well as the "[" command, are not required to know the "==" operator. Only a few implementations like bash and some versions of ksh support it. When you run "test foo == foo" on a platform that does not support the "==" operator, the result will be "false" instead of "true". This can lead to unexpected behavior. There are two ways to fix this error message. If the file that contains the "test ==" is needed for building the package, you should create a patch for it, replacing the "==" operator with "=". If the file is not needed, add its name to the CHECK_PORTABILITY_SKIP variable in the package Makefile. =========================================================================== ERROR: [check-portability] => Found test ... == ...: ERROR: [check-portability] binmodules/luasocket/gem/myps2pdf:88: if [ $a4 == 1 ] Explanation: =========================================================================== The "test" command, as well as the "[" command, are not required to know the "==" operator. Only a few implementations like bash and some versions of ksh support it. When you run "test foo == foo" on a platform that does not support the "==" operator, the result will be "false" instead of "true". This can lead to unexpected behavior. There are two ways to fix this error message. If the file that contains the "test ==" is needed for building the package, you should create a patch for it, replacing the "==" operator with "=". If the file is not needed, add its name to the CHECK_PORTABILITY_SKIP variable in the package Makefile. =========================================================================== ERROR: [check-portability] => Found test ... == ...: ERROR: [check-portability] binmodules/luasocket/gem/myps2pdf:107: if [ $do_opt == 1 ] Explanation: =========================================================================== The "test" command, as well as the "[" command, are not required to know the "==" operator. Only a few implementations like bash and some versions of ksh support it. When you run "test foo == foo" on a platform that does not support the "==" operator, the result will be "false" instead of "true". This can lead to unexpected behavior. There are two ways to fix this error message. If the file that contains the "test ==" is needed for building the package, you should create a patch for it, replacing the "==" operator with "=". If the file is not needed, add its name to the CHECK_PORTABILITY_SKIP variable in the package Makefile. =========================================================================== *** Error code 1 Stop. bmake[1]: stopped making "configure" in /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/devel/premake5 *** Error code 1 Stop. bmake: stopped making "configure" in /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-upstream-trunk/devel/premake5