+ case "${usergroup_phase}" in
+ local run_cmd
+ run_cmd=run_su
+ shift
+ run_su /usr/pkg/bin/bmake configure BATCH=1 DEPENDS_TARGET=/nonexistent WRKLOG=/tmp/bulklog/premake5-5.0.0.b2/work.log
+ su pbulk -c '"$@"' make /usr/pkg/bin/bmake configure BATCH=1 DEPENDS_TARGET=/nonexistent WRKLOG=/tmp/bulklog/premake5-5.0.0.b2/work.log
=> Bootstrap dependency digest>=20211023: found digest-20220214
=> Checksum BLAKE2s OK for premake-5.0.0-beta2-src.zip
=> Checksum SHA512 OK for premake-5.0.0-beta2-src.zip
===> Installing dependencies for premake5-5.0.0.b2
=> Tool dependency mktools-[0-9]*: found mktools-20220614
=> Tool dependency nbpatch-[0-9]*: found nbpatch-20151107
=> Tool dependency unzip-[0-9]*: found unzip-6.0nb9
=> Tool dependency cwrappers>=20150314: found cwrappers-20220403
=> Tool dependency checkperms>=1.1: found checkperms-1.12
=> Full dependency libuuid>=2.18: found libuuid-2.32.1nb1
===> Overriding tools for premake5-5.0.0.b2
===> Extracting for premake5-5.0.0.b2
===> Patching for premake5-5.0.0.b2
=> Applying pkgsrc patches for premake5-5.0.0.b2
=> Verifying /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-el7-trunk-x86_64/devel/premake5/patches/patch-aa
=> Applying pkgsrc patch /data/jenkins/workspace/pkgsrc-el7-trunk-x86_64/devel/premake5/patches/patch-aa
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$NetBSD: patch-aa,v 1.1 2023/05/08 22:37:31 nikita Exp $
|
|Remove the hardcoded -L/usr/lib and -L/usr/lib64
|This is not needed, and will cause issues:
|https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/25825#issuecomment-1179497476
|
|--- modules/d/tools/dmd.lua
|+++ modules/d/tools/dmd.lua
--------------------------
Patching file modules/d/tools/dmd.lua using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 52.
Hmm...  The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- modules/d/tools/gdc.lua
|+++ modules/d/tools/gdc.lua
--------------------------
Patching file modules/d/tools/gdc.lua using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 228.
Hmm...  The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- modules/d/tools/ldc.lua
|+++ modules/d/tools/ldc.lua
--------------------------
Patching file modules/d/tools/ldc.lua using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 323.
Hmm...  The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- modules/gmake/tests/cpp/test_ldflags.lua
|+++ modules/gmake/tests/cpp/test_ldflags.lua
--------------------------
Patching file modules/gmake/tests/cpp/test_ldflags.lua using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 55.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 64.
Hmm...  The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- modules/gmake2/tests/test_gmake2_ldflags.lua
|+++ modules/gmake2/tests/test_gmake2_ldflags.lua
--------------------------
Patching file modules/gmake2/tests/test_gmake2_ldflags.lua using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 56.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 65.
Hmm...  The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- src/tools/gcc.lua
|+++ src/tools/gcc.lua
--------------------------
Patching file src/tools/gcc.lua using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 477.
done
===> Creating toolchain wrappers for premake5-5.0.0.b2
===> Configuring for premake5-5.0.0.b2
=> Checking for portability problems in extracted files